Wednesday, June 17, 2009

POP CULTURE: DONALD TRUMP BUYS WWE






JUST WHEN YOU THOUGHT HE MAY BE TAKING A BREAK FROM THE SPOTLIGHT, THE “TRUMPSTER” SMACKS YOU ACROSS THE GRILL, LIKE RICK JAMES TO CHARLIE MURPHY. YES THAT WAS A DAVE CHAPELLE REFERENCE. I HAVE A WHOLE GANG OF EM. STAY TUNED. LOL. THAT’S RIGHT, DONALD TRUMP, THE MAN WITH THE OUTER GALAXY SIZED EGO, AND APPARENTLY, ACCORDING TO SOME, THE MIDAS TOUCH, HAS JUST PURCHSED THE WRESTLING ENTERTAINMENT JUGGERNAUT, WWE. YES, THAT WAS A REFERENCE TO THE GREEK GOD OF GOLD, MIDAS. I HAVE ALL KINDS OF REFERENCES. BUT BACK TO THE WWE SALE & PURCHASE. I GREW UP ON WRESTLING, AND HAVE BEEN A FAN, FOR THE MOST PART, EVER SINCE. THIS WILL NO DOUBT BE AN INTERESTING LOOK FOR THE COMPANY. IT’LL BE INTERESTING TO SEE WHAT CHANGES HE MAKES, IMMEDIATE & OTHERWISE. IN THE INTERIM CHECK OUT THE ARTICLE. CHEERS & ENJOY.

Trump Buys WWE RAW

Commenting on the deal, WWE Chairman Vince McMahon stated "This was an offer I couldn't refuse."

STAMFORD, CT—World Wrestling Entertainment announced the sale of its ratings juggernaut, "Monday Night RAW," on USA Network to Donald Trump. The terms of the deal were not disclosed.

Commenting on the deal WWE Chairman Vince McMahon stated, "This was an offer I couldn't refuse."

"The 'Monday Night RAW' franchise has been one of the top cable franchises since its launch 17 years ago," said Donald Trump. "I'm going to do things on the show that have never been done or seen before. As my first act as owner, I am doing something unprecedented. I am giving back to the people who have been loyal all these years. For the first time in more than 838 episodes of "RAW," next week's show will be live and commercial free."

Mr. Trump will be making his first live appearance as the new owner of the "RAW" franchise this Monday. The episode will run commercial-free on USA Network at 9:00 PM ET/8:00 PM CT on Monday, June 22nd.

"Donald Trump is one of the most entertaining personalities with one of the sharpest business minds of our time. He's always had the Midas touch, which will only add to the level of excitement for the loyal fans of "WWE Monday Night Raw,"" said Chris McCumber EVP Marketing, Digital and Brand Strategy for USA Network.

POP CULTURE: VIBE ELITE EIGHT GREATEST RAPPER EVER LIST





Vibe has put on a dope contest, highlighting the best rappers ever to bless a mic, and begging the question of who the greatest mc actually is. They started this contest a while ago, and they’re recognizing 60 rappers in 60 days. Right now they’re at the elite eight. Shout out the NCAA. Haha. They even have the March Madness brackets and everything. Here’ s the link to the article. Cheers & enjoy


http://www.vibe.com/news/online_exclusives/2009/06/the_best_rapper_ever_the_elite_eight/

Monday, June 15, 2009

FASHION: HEELS 2009 EDITION: TAPERED HEELS


I love em. There’s few things that are sexier on a woman than a fly, classy, sexy pair of heels, or other form-complementing shoes. I have the exclusive insider info on the latest trends in all things fashion. We’ll start with these sexy shoes, & keep it moving with everything from gladiator heels, to fringed dress & shoes, to Sheer, & much more. Enjoy. I know I will. I love it

When writing about the latest fashion trends we're constantly looking at the clothing, hair trends and make-up trends, but sometimes it's easy to forget about a girl's most important accessory: her shoes. So here it is, your shoe guide to Autumn (Fall)/Winter 2008/2009 in the form of our 2008/2009 shoe trends bible!

Square toes, crocodile skin, triple-buckles, and bohemian fringing are just some of the things you might not have been expecting to come back into fashion so soon, and yet here IS A SAMPLE OF THE SEXINESS TO COME.

Tapered heels

What: Heels that start thick at the top and taper down, often with a curve, into a stiletto-esque point at the bottom.

Seen on: the likes of Burberry Prorsum, 3.1 Phillip Lim, and Zac Posen.

Verdict: They're a sexy, interesting and modern style which can really spice up an outfit. Not as much a classic shape, so buy them if you intend to get a lot of wear out of them over the next few seasons.

MOVIE TRAILERS: HANGOVER

HOT OFF OF TWO WEEKS OF UBER SUCCES, COMPARATIVELY SPEAKING, THE BRADLEY COOPER COMEDY ROMP HAS MADE A LOT OF MONEY (REFERENCE MY HOLLYWOOD REPORTER WIDGET FOR EXACT FIGURES), SHINED THE SPOTLIGHT BACK ONTO MR. COOPER IN THE PROCESS, & BECAME THE 1ST OFFICIAL BIG HIT OF THE SUMMER. IF YOU HAVEN’T SEEN IT YET, DO SO, AND TELL ME HOW JUVENILEY FUNNY IT WAS AFTERWARDS. CHEERS, & ENJOY THIS TRAILER.


BOOK REVIEW: A PRAIRIE TALE, MELISSA GILBERT


HERE’S ANOTHER JUICY BOOK FROM MY CELEBRITY SERIES, AND IT’S FROM ACTRESS MELISSA GILBERT, OF LITTLE HOUSE ON THE PRAIRIE & GILMORE GIRLS FAME. I’VE READ SOME EXCERPTS & IT APPEARS TO BE QUITE REVEALING & CANDID, WHICH ARE TWO WORDS THAT PRETTY MUCH GUARANTEE A JUICY TELL ALL. CHECK OUT THE ARTICLE, THEN CHECK OUT THE BOOK. CHEERS & ENJOY

Melissa Gilbert’s complicated ‘Prairie’ life

The actress opens about her difficult childhood, addictions and more

TODAY books

updated 10:48 a.m. ET, Tues., June 9, 2009

Actress Melissa Gilbert of “Little House on the Prairie” was America’s sweetheart and many presumed she enjoyed a blessed childhood. But in reality, the talented star’s home life was a far cry from the idyllic life she portrayed in the popular TV show. In her new memoir, “Prairie Tale,” Melissa Gilbert shares her story of growing up in front of the cameras, dealing with a complicated family, overcoming addictions, and how she finally learned to move on. An excerpt:

Fairy Dust

My mother was nearly a month past her husband’s funeral when she turned her attention back to my desire to write a memoir. It wasn’t just a desire; there was an actual book deal, and she was against it. If the book were on any topic other than myself, she would’ve already been circulating word that “Melissa is writing the best book ever.” But this was different. It was about me. Which meant it was also about her. And she was against telling that story if she wasn’t the one doing the telling.

She had tried numerous times to talk me out of it, but her efforts were interrupted by the death of my stepfather, Hollywood publicist Warren Cowan. Now she was back on point.

She showed up at my house one afternoon carrying a large box packed with news clippings, ads, letters, and diaries of mine. She set it down on the kitchen table with a thud and announced with a smile as deadly as a pearl-handled Derringer that the contents would be helpful.

“For your book,” she said, pronouncing the word ‘book’ as if were a Petrie dish containing the Ebola virus that I was going to let out in the world.

I marveled at her gamesmanship — and at her. She looked a decade younger than her age, which, if revealed, would be taken as a bigger crime than revealing Valerie Plame was a CIA agent. Her hair was blonde and coiffed. It’s sufficient and necessary to say she was strikingly attractive. She looked great whether going to her weekly appointment at the hair salon or movie night at the Playboy mansion, which she and my step-father had attended for years.

I also cringed at the layers at play here in my kitchen. I thought, thank goodness I have four sons. The mother-daughter relationship is one of mankind’s great mysteries, and for womankind it can be hellaciously complicated. My mother and I are quintessential examples of the rewards and frustrations and the joys and infuriations it can yield. By and large, we are close. At times, though, she had rendered me speechless with her craftiness. Now was one of those times.

While I sifted through the box packed with sacred bits from my life, my mother offered sly commentary and full-on reinterpretations of the contents. Ah, the contempt and fear and anger she hid behind her helpful smile.

To me, at forty-four years old, my book was a search for truth and identity. To her, it was — if only you could have seen the look on her face, you’d fully understand — the ultimate betrayal.

I moved on. I made tea. We talked about some of the condolences about Warren that continued to stream in. We mentioned which friends checked on her, the dinner invitations that kept her busy as ever, and of course the latest comings and goings about my husband, Bruce, and my sons. Finally, after we had caught each other up on everything, she returned to the book.

“You can write the book if you want,” she said with a nonchalant shrug.

“Thank you,” I replied. “I’m looking forward to it.”

“I can understand why you want to write it,” my mother said. “You write it and get it all out of you.”

“Thank you.”

“You have my blessing.”

“Thank you again.”

“But,” she said, “the classy thing would be to burn it after you’re finished.”

* * *

My life was a mystery even as I lived it.

Several months earlier, I had called my mother and asked if I’d ever had a conversion ceremony to make me officially Jewish. Although I was raised Jewish, my upbringing didn’t include any formal religious education or training. We celebrated Passover, and other major Jewish holidays. But we also celebrated Christmas and Easter. It’s why I always emphasized the “ish” in “Jewish.”

As I got older, though, I grew more observant and intrigued by a more personal relationship with God. One day as I discussed this with a friend who had converted to Judaism as an adult, she asked if I recalled my conversion ceremony.

“Huh?” I said.

My friend explained that adults wanting to switch to Judaism from another religion had to go through a conversion process. It included reading and discussion among friends; a deeper course of investigation with a rabbi; then study, immersion, and approval by a board, culminating with a public ceremony and celebration.

Even though I was just a day-old when my parents adopted me, my friend explained my parents would still have needed a rabbi to perform a ceremony and a blessing to make me officially Jewish. That’s when I asked my mother if she recalled doing the ceremony.

“Why do you need to know now?” she asked.

“Because if I never had a conversion ceremony, then I’m not really Jewish,” I replied. “And if I’m not Jewish —”

“But you’re Jewish,” she interrupted.

“Who says?” I asked.

“I do.”

“Mom, believe it or not, you are not the final authority on this issue.”

“I’m your mother,” she said. “And I’m Jewish.”

“But my birth parents” —

“We adopted you at birth.”

“Was there a conversion ceremony?” I asked.

“I don’t remember,” she said.

“You don’t remember?”

“No.”

“No?”

When it came to my childhood, my mother’s memory was more reliable than the Apple-S command on my laptop, so I knew she had the information filed away somewhere. I switched tactics. I asked if she remembered what I did for my second birthday. She did, and described the party she threw me. I then asked if she remembered my first birthday party. She recounted that, too, including the flavor of the cake and the bakery where she bought it.

“Mom,” I said with a dramatic pause worthy of the best courtroom lawyer, “you can remember my first and second birthday parties as if they happened an hour ago. But you can’t remember whether you hired a rabbi and had a conversion ceremony for me. How is that?”

“Melissa!”

“Mom!”

“Maybe I didn’t have one,” she said. “I don’t really know. What’s the big deal?”

“It means I’m not Jewish,” I said. “It means I’m not who I thought I was for all these years. It changes everything.”

* * *

OK, I exaggerated. It wouldn’t change everything. When I hung up the phone, I was still going to be me: dressed in sweats, juggling car-pool duties, going to meetings, planning dinner, trying to wedge more into my day than twenty-four hours permitted. In one sense, my life would be fundamentally unchanged.

However, in another sense, my inner compass had already started to spin wildly out of control. Was there a conversion ceremony? That was a simple question. Was I who I thought I was? Not such a simple question.

Welcome to my not-so-simple life. My mother, whom I love dearly, has continually revised my life story within the context of a complicated family history that includes more than the usual share of divorce, step-children, dysfunction, and obfuscation, and I’ve spent most of my adult life attempting to deconstruct that history and separate fact from fiction, especially as the facts pertain to … me!

For example, my mother was at the helm of everything, including my career, my food intake, and how I dressed — my whole life. I never questioned her or rebelled. Speaking out against the family was the ultimate form of disloyalty, and disloyalty was not tolerated. It was like the mafia. Although I never feared getting whacked, I was always just a little afraid of being sent back to wherever it was I came from.

So an interview back when I was ten years old is likely to have me saying that everything is wonderful, everyone in my life is fantastic, I am happy, and life is perfect. But most of that was untrue. Just as in an interview three months after my mom’s second husband suffered a brain hemorrhage I told a reporter that I had my crying moments, but I was pretty tough about that sort of thing.

The truth is that I never cried over my mom’s second husband. I was never close to him. I never liked him. I didn’t have any relationship with him. I was dragged to the hospital when he was sick to add cachét so the nurses would take better care of him. I know it was difficult for my mother, but I don’t remember being upset about anything at the time.

Could I say that to the press? Absolutely not.

A large part of my life has been an illusion — not an illusion crafted through carefully controlled media, but more like light going through a prism in that there’s one story bent in numerous directions. There’s my mother’s version, there’s the one in the press, there’s the one I lived, and there’s the one I’m still trying to figure out.

However, there are some facts. For instance, I am a twice-married, now-sober former-child actor and mother of four. I acquired all those hyphenates by living the way I wanted to or needed to, hopefully with some grace and dignity. I made my share of mistakes, which I think of as the stones I stepped on to get to where I am today, and through luck, hard work, serious reflection, and a desire to face the truth about myself, I ended up at a place where now I enjoy the peace that comes from allowing myself to not be perfect.

Such was not always the case. My mother, beautiful, delicate, and deluded, saw me as the pillar of perfection — and told me that I was the world’s best actor, the best wife, the best … at everything. I knew I wasn’t, but I lived my life as though I had to be the best lest I disappoint her.

Today, I just want to be my best and I don’t fear disappointing anyone other than myself and my family. I’m in love with a good man, and my children are brave, funny, and compassionate people. I love the lines around my eyes, but I hate the way my cheeks are falling; I’m carrying around an extra ten pounds and enjoying it (most of the time). I suppose I am truly fat and happy.

I play drums, surf and meditate. I’m in a peaceful state of mind most of the time. Though I am lucky enough to earn a living at a job I love, I’m also thinking about going back to school to get my RN or LVN in end-of-life pediatric care. I’m much better going forward than backwards or sideways. I have no real plan, just general dreams.

It wasn’t always like this. I wasn’t always at peace. I wasn’t always content to let life happen.

II.

For my first couple of decades, there was fairy dust sprinkled over everything in my life courtesy of my mother. According to her, and via her, through the press, everything was sparkly, beautiful, and perfect. Everyone was well behaved. We didn’t have any problems. We never had colds.

In reality, things were quite different … and not okay. One of the first times I recall opening my eyes to this was when Rob Lowe and I were planning our wedding. Our plans were becoming ridiculously overblown and we were even talking about renting a sound stage. Oh, then there were the doves. Doves? Oy! It was a whole production.

One day my mother and I were in the car, going to meet the wedding planner and the florist. I was anxious about everything from the wedding details to the commitment I was about to make to Rob. I was a kid living a big life and growing up fast. Those years I spent in the “Brat Pack” (I really hate that stupid name) running with Rob, Emilio, and Tom, that was my equivalent to college. I didn’t have the confidence of a bride-to-be. Nervous and near tears, I was a babbling river of anxiety and fear.

“I’m so scared about this,” I told my mom. “I don’t know, I don’t know. Am I doing the right thing? Am I making a huge mistake? Can this work?”

My mother gave me a look full of calm and wisdom. “Sweetheart, don’t worry,” she said with total sincerity and earnestness. “Rob will make a wonderful first husband.”

I heard that and something inside me clicked. It was my first allergic reaction to my mother’s fairy dust. I thought, That is a really tweaked way of looking at life, and I knew something was not right. And such were our issues, my issues.

***

Like so many women I’ve met, my issues eventually caught up with me. I got to a point in life, somewhere into my second marriage and during my effort to get sober, where reality tapped me on the shoulder, demanding attention, asking questions I’d never stopped to consider: Who are you? How’d you get here? What does it mean to be a wife, a mother, a woman? What will make you happy? What does a peaceful life look like to you?

Sometimes life is like an uninvited houseguest. It shows up and refuses to leave until you deal with it. Call me a late bloomer, but I didn’t feel eighteen until I was in my twenties, and I didn’t start putting my life together until much, much later.

Furthermore, I still get letters from women whose lives were and often still are truly horrible, victims of physical and sexual abuse. These women say the one escape they had growing up was Little House on the Prairie. They wished they had Laura Ingalls Wilder’s life the way I played her. What I don’t ever tell them is that I’m also among those who wish I had Laura’s life the way I played her.

For me, work was a fantasy where I was a happy-go-lucky kid with a larger-than-life surrogate father in Michael Landon. There were people I could talk to and count on, and horses and cows and other animals I could play with in an idyllic outdoor setting. In real life, I struggled with the mythology of my existence — the story of my birth grew from the fairy dust my mother sprinkled on the truth, whatever that was.

I always knew I was adopted. I was told that I was the child of a prima ballerina and a Rhodes Scholar; my mother was a beautiful dancer who wasn’t able to give up her career, not just yet, and my father was in the middle of some project, and though I was the product of a loving relationship between two brilliant individuals, the timing was simply off, so they gave me up for adoption, this wonder-child endowed with the gifts of both Margot Fontaine and Steven Hawking. My mother recognized in me the potential to not just be good but the most exceptional, and, well, that story was perpetuated over the years, told and retold like some sort of fairytale or legend, and so on.

Finally, I reached the age where I was able to fact check the story and found out my mother the dancer was in fact a dancer. What kind of dancer was never clear. She wasn’t a prima ballerina, though. That much I figured out. And my father the Rhodes Scholar was a sign painter and stock car racer. They were both married to other people. They each had three children. They ran off together, got pregnant, moved in together with six children, and decided they couldn’t afford a seventh.

So they gave me up for adoption, a child who would eventually end up wondering who I really am, who I’m related to, if I have a predisposition for high blood pressure, heart disease, diabetes, any history of cancer or personality issues. f that’s asking too much, I’m willing to settle for finding out who gave me the nose I disposed of at eighteen.

III.

The latest twist in the story of my birth was brought to light a few days after my stepfather died. Close family and friends were at my mother’s, and my godmother, Mitzi, started in about the day my parents picked me up at the hospital. She was hilarious as she described my parents and their first day with a newborn. Out of the blue my mother said, “Well, imagine what a shock it was for me!”

Everyone turned toward my mother, including me. She wasn’t joking. She looked as if she were reliving that shock.

“I mean, we had no plans to adopt a child,” she said.

As I had many times throughout my adult life, I cocked my head and flashed a quizzical look at my mother. What?

“We weren’t even looking,” she continued. “Then I got a phone call that there was a baby available and did I want it?” She turned to me. “I called your dad. He was on the road and he said, ‘Yes, that’s the one. Go get it.’”

“It?” I said. “You keep referring to me as an it.”

“Well, actually, you weren’t even born yet.”

This was news to me. And I would have explored it further except new people arrived at my mother’s and she switched into hostess mode.

A few days later my mother came over to my house and we talked about my step-dad’s death. I walked her through it because she didn’t remember much; by contrast, I remembered everything in detail. I had brought in a superb hospice team and used my training to turn into a patient advocate, which allowed my mother and the love of her life to have a peaceful goodbye.

I told her who had come to visit those final days, and then I described how she had spent Warren’s last day alive laying in bed next to him, sharing her strength and comforting him through his final moments. I told her what I saw as I watched him take his final breaths wrapped in her arms. I thanked her for letting me be a part of something so private, so spiritual, and so profoundly moving.

After a good cry, I reminded her of the story she and Mitzi had started to tell about my arrival in this world. I still wanted clarification. Tired and vulnerable, she opened up and said that she and my father had been trying to have a baby and were actually going through fertility treatments when she got the call. The strange part was, until then, they had not spoken about adoption — or so she said.

A few weeks later I was replaying that conversation and realized something. My father had a daughter from a previous marriage. I’d met her once. And my mother was pregnant twice after me, once with a baby she lost at six months and once with my sister Sara. Both of my parents were fertile. So why couldn’t they — Obviously more was going on than I knew. Once again, the beginning of my life was defined by a question mark.

Excerpted from “Prairie Tale” by Melissa Gilbert. Copyright (c) 2009, reprinted with permission from Simon & Schuster.

© 2009 MSNBC Interactive

URL: http://today.msnbc.msn.com/id/31173128/

POP CULTURE: TOP 10 IRRITATING CARTOON CHARACTERS OF ALL TIME


HERE’S A FUN LISTING FROM MY AMIGOS AT ASK MEN MAGAZINE: THE TOP 10 MOST IRRITATING CARTOON CHARACTERS OF ALL TIME. CHEERS & ENJOY

Top 10: Irritating Cartoon Characters

Even the coolest of cartoons had its lame-duck character. Here are 10 personalities who ruined our Saturday mornings.

By Ryan Murphy, Entertainment Correspondent

Page 1: Irritating cartoon characters

Robin from Batman is an irritating cartoon character

From the 1960s until the 1990s, Saturday mornings were synonymous with cartoons. Children from coast to coast knew they could park themselves in front of the TV with a bowl of Count Chocula in their laps and indulge in hours of mindless entertainment.

Mind you, it wasn’t always perfect. For every character you loved on a show there were literally dozens of irritating cartoon characters that you reviled. These animated annoyances were so incredibly awkward, meddlesome and arrogant that you wanted to take them by their scrawny little necks and give them a proper thrashing.

It’s with these supremely aggravating figures in mind that we proudly present our list of the top 10 most irritating cartoon characters to ever grace the small screen. Top off your bowl of cereal and tune in!

Number 10

Robin

Batman

Lame doesn’t even begin to describe what your life must be like when you spend your teenage years cruising around town with a 35-year-old man, wearing little more than a pair of green leotards. If he had served a better purpose it would have been one thing, but Robin’s primary duty was to get rescued by the Dark Knight while uttering idiotic lines like “Leaping lizards, Batman!” Thanks, but if our life is on the line, we’ll stick with Superman.

Number 9

Rocket J. Squirrel

The Rocky and Bullwinkle Show

We’ve always believed that squirrels are just rats with better PR, which is one of many reasons we detest Rocky the Flying Squirrel. We also hate his morally righteous attitude and his voice, which is so gratingly high-pitched that it sounds like he has been squeezing his nuts rather than hiding them.

Number 8

Boo-Boo Bear

The Yogi Bear Show

It’s appropriate that Boo-Boo is named after a mistake, because that’s precisely what William Hanna and Joseph Barbera made when they added this pint-sized cub to The Yogi Bear Show. A genuine wet blanket, this blue bow-tie-wearing bupkes always brought the action to a grinding halt, preventing his old pal Yogi from satisfying his carnal need for “pic-a-nic” baskets. And what was the deal with his painfully plodding cadence? If anyone actually thought as slowly as he talked they’d still be deciding what to have for breakfast yesterday. Suffice it to say, this Jellystone Park resident was -- and always will be -- duller than the average bear.

Other irritating cartoon characters who ruined your Saturday morning…

Page 2: Cartoon characters

Number 7

Newton

The Mighty Hercules

Easily the most inept superhero sidekick of all-time, Hercules’ little buddy was constantly getting nabbed by Daedalus and even his cat Dydo. No matter how you do the math, the bare-chested, girly sounding Newton was half boy, half horse and all annoying.

Number 6

Dennis Mitchell

Dennis the Menace

The very personification of annoyance, Dennis Mitchell was a devilish little imp whose mischievous spirit caused headaches for everyone around him. From the smudge of dirt on his nose to the well-worn slingshot protruding from his back pocket, this spawn of satan was less welcome than mono at a make-out party.

Number 5

Tweety Bird

Looney Tunes

We’ve never subscribed to the belief that something is adorable simply because it’s pathetically undersized, and that’s especially true with Tweety. This cloying yellow canary’s schtick can be boiled down to a single redundant plot, a tiresome catchphrase and a voice so sickly sweet that it could send a listener spiraling into a diabetic coma.

Number 4

Olive Oyl

Popeye

We like our cartoon characters to be voluptuous vixens like Jessica Rabbit, which is why we’ve always been disappointed by Olive Oyl, a one-dimensional beanpole with enormous feet and breasts that look like mosquito bites. In addition to having a face that could stop a clock, Olive Oyl was also constantly disrupting Popeye’s schedule by getting kidnapped and tied to railroad tracks. Just once we would have loved to have seen the crusty ‘ol sailor man leave her there and get on with his life.

The top three irritating cartoon characters…

Page 3: Cartoons

The Flinstones' Great Gazoo was a very annoying cartoon character

Number 3

Lucy van Pelt

A Boy Named Charlie Brown

A fuss-budget of the first degree, Lucy lived to torment others. Whether converting Linus’ beloved blankie into a kite or swiping the football away from Charlie Brown at the last possible moment, her thoughtless actions always left a path of heartache and destruction in their wake. As if that weren’t bad enough, Lucy was also the group’s resident know-it-all whose psychiatric advice would always leave her patients feeling more distressed than when they arrived. It’s no wonder that Schroeder constantly rejected her advances.

Number 2

Woody Woodpecker

The Woody Woodpecker Show

One of the industry’s original screwball characters, Woody Woodpecker was a cruel prankster with the kind of voice that would make you want to drive a lawn dart into your ears. When he wasn’t polluting the air with his sickening laughter, Woody was stealing from hapless victims and drilling his razor-sharp beak into the heads of innocent bystanders.

Number 1

The Great Gazoo

The Flintstones

It’s never a good sign when you need to introduce an annoying green alien to help reinvigorate your program. It’s especially troubling when your program is set in the Stone Age. That was precisely what happened on October 29, 1965, when producers of The Flintstones foisted The Great Gazoo on an unsuspecting public. This blatant Mr. Mxyzptlk knockoff was constantly showing up at the most inopportune of times and would literally add insult to injury when he would refer to Fred and Barney as a pair of “dumb-dumbs.” Not surprisingly, The Flintstones was canceled soon after The Great Gazoo’s first appearance, bringing an inglorious end to an otherwise classic cartoon.

toon in

Unfortunately for today’s cartoon aficionados, annoying characters aren’t limited to a single generation. Irritating sidekicks and meddlesome villains continue to pollute our screens and ruin promising shows.

POP CULTURE: LATE NIGHT TV WARS


FORGET CLASH OF THE TITANS, NEVER MIND BATTLE OF THE GLADIATORS. THERE’S A NEW WAR RAGING IN POP CULTURE, AND IT INVOLVES YOUR FAVORITE LATE NIGHT TV HOST. WITH ALL OF THESE RECENT CHANGES OF THE GUARD, ILL-ADVISED COMMENTS, & BASKETBALL ASSISTED GIMMICKS, EACH OF OUR LATE NIGHT HOSTS HAVE OUR ATTENTION, FOR WHATEVER REASON, & THEY WANT DESPERATELY TO KEEP IT. SO WHO’S IT GONNA BE. WHILE YOU’RE CONTEMPLATING, CHECK OUT THIS ARTICLE & GET BACK TO ME.

The Fight For Late Night

Conan O'Brien, Jimmy Fallon, David Letterman, and the other late night hosts vie for your attention

More

By Lynette Rice

Something monumental occurred on TV earlier this month that didn't involve Jon and Kate Gosselin or the notorious Spencer and Heidi Pratt. For only the fourth time in its 55-year history, The Tonight Show saw a changing of the guard. As had been planned since 2004, Conan O'Brien, 46, took over for Jay Leno, 59, and their styles couldn't be more different: Leno is a populist. O'Brien is niche. Leno's humor is broad. O'Brien's is quirky tomfoolery (look no further than his June 4 skit in which he poses for his own paparazzi picture).

And there's nothing — absolutely nothing — in the TV industry that's being more scrutinized right now than the newest race to dominate late night. ''There are going to be people who habitually watch The Tonight Show, so Conan is going to have to assume the tone of the show,'' says a high-ranking executive at a competing network. ''But you're going to have real brand issues. Conan's going to have to play — for lack of a better word — blander to appeal to that broad audience. I think that's going to be really, really tough.''

The stakes are enormous: Late-night shows are major moneymakers (Leno recently bragged that it costs less to produce five Tonight Shows than a single episode of an hour-long drama), and they can define the sensibility of an entire network. So it's no wonder that almost every broadcaster and many cable networks want one — or four. (Starting in September, NBC alone will be airing three and a half hours of talk shows every night.) And with 10 of them airing on six networks between 11 p.m. and 2 a.m., celebrity booking wars are inevitable. So is viewer fatigue: How much silliness and sarcasm can one person really watch? Sure, all the shows will probably survive — but at what cost? And what shape will they be in after the bloody battle?

O'Brien's 16-year-long tenure at 12:35 a.m. didn't exactly blow the roof off NBC. Though it was beloved by critics and Emmy voters, Late Night With Conan O'Brien began to show ratings vulnerability against time-slot competitors Jimmy Kimmel Live! and The Late Late Show With Craig Ferguson long before O'Brien stepped down in February. So pundits were wary before his first Tonight Show outing on June 1. And yet by all accounts he had a terrific night, both critically (EW's television critic Ken Tucker called it ''a large-scale, impressive debut'') and with viewers: O'Brien earned a 7.1/17 preliminary rating in homes, a 78 percent improvement over Leno's Monday-through-Friday average. ''We are the superstars of TV because we are the only network that anyone is talking about,'' proclaims Ben Silverman, the NBC Entertainment co-chairman. ''We're all so excited because the numbers are really broad, he's really connecting, and the shows are so qualitatively good.'' Yet opening-night ratings are always inflated because of initial interest, and by June 8, O'Brien's ratings dropped 56 percent to a more typical 3.1/8 — just a hair better than Letterman's 3.0/8. O'Brien's numbers should hold at more or less these levels through the summer — well, until Sept. 14, to be exact. That's when Leno takes his act to prime time, five days a week at 10 p.m. And that's when things will get interesting.

Depending on whom you talk to in Hollywood, shifting Leno to earlier in the evening is either the most brilliant move in broadcast history (''Audiences are hungry for an alternative at 10, and the alternative they want is comedy,'' insists NBC's head of research, Alan Wurtzel) or the most stupid (''Leno and O'Brien are basically going for the same material and the same audience,'' counters the high-ranking exec. ''If I were NBC, I'd be concerned they may start to plagiarize one another''). Despite what Leno says publicly, few believe his show will be markedly different from his version of The Tonight Show: Sketches, a monologue, and a celeb-friendly place to promote projects are bound to be the norm. And that proven formula is going to make life a lot harder for Leno's former peers — a possibility that Leno perpetuated when he said that even young people don't stay up late these days. Battles to land A-list talent will be fierce. The chance to sit on Leno's couch in prime time could end up being far more appealing than, say, going mano a mano with O'Brien 90 minutes later. ''To say there's not going to be this 'If you do them, you can't do us' is bulls---,'' says one high-powered publicist. ''There's definitely going to be a war.''

But the biggest fight will be for the after-hours audience. While the number of homes watching television at that time has remained consistent over the last five years — about 39 percent — viewers have abandoned the traditional late-night hosts for other alternatives. Despite his 14-season dominance, Leno was still down nearly 12 percent before he left The Tonight Show on May 29, while CBS' The Late Show With David Letterman is off 15 percent. Where did the viewers go? Some went to Kimmel — the 41-year-old host is up an impressive 14 percent — and others drifted to Comedy Central's The Daily Show and The Colbert Report. But the biggest drain on the late-night arena came from a player without a pulse: Almost 6 million people use the period between 11:30 p.m. and 12:30 a.m. to play back shows they've recorded on their DVRs.

And the landscape is only going to get more fractured. In November, comedian Wanda Sykes (The New Adventures of Old Christine) will host a Saturday-night talk show on Fox (some have speculated it could eventually move to weekdays, if it succeeds), while TBS will also enter the fray in November with new programs featuring George Lopez and Tim Meadows. Though Lopez's four-day-a-week show at 11 p.m. will inevitably resemble a traditional chatfest — he'll do a monologue and host guests and musical acts — he says his Latino heritage gives him a substantial advantage over his white counterparts. ''I don't need anybody white to watch my show and I can still win,'' says the 48-year-old comedian. ''Even Chris Rock told me I don't need to speak English to win.'' (Meadows' weekly half-hour show, by comparison, will be more a showcase for stand-ups.)

But as appealing as the alternatives may seem, all eyes will continue to focus on the Big Three and whether O'Brien can inherit the King of Late Night throne. He'll have to contend with Letterman for a while, since CBS has an agreement in place to keep the 62-year-old host on the air through 2012. Not surprisingly, advertisers drew their conclusions long before O'Brien taped his first show on the Universal Studios lot. ''There is that initial curiosity, but in the end, Letterman is the most mainstream of what's there,'' says Shari Anne Brill, the director of programming at Carat, a media-buying firm. ''I think Letterman will probably wind up surpassing O'Brien, and Leno devotees will watch him earlier.''

Ouch. To his credit, however, O'Brien appears to be taking the naysayers in stride; he's not above doing a little prognosticating himself. On his opening night, O'Brien gave a humble shout-out to the ''man who hosted this show for 17 years [and] took very good care of this franchise... Mr. Jay Leno,'' before deadpanning, ''and he's gonna be coming back on the air, I think, in two days — three days, maybe, tops.''

SOUORCE: ENTERTAINMENT WEEKLY